Thomas Pal Assignment five feedback
Tutor feedback received and I have to be honest I feel that this has probably been my best-received feedback where he has commented on that I stepped out of my comfort zone delivering a strong image with immediate graphic content. I feel that I have achieved something during this assignment. The idea of exploring this as a mini-series is something I have thought about but, only in thought.
Exploring a subject is something I’ve not done with any of the assignments though most have a similar concept to them. By changing my tactic and approaching self-portraits has now given me food for thought in where this assignment could progress to. Work in progress should have been able to explore a different side to this and I can see how the one idea was fixed in my sights and this is what I wanted it to be.
Below was mentioned.
The method of conjoining appears to be that you’ve shot each part separately and then ripped the images printed onto paper to assemble the final images. Importantly, the vertical paper tear runs directly through your face – maybe suggesting some type of rupture or fissure between the two versions of yourself. I say this because the process of rough-and-ready ripping of paper could also be associated with a destructive handling of images. It’s not clear whether that vertical rip is a device linked to meaning, exploring how you feel personally/emotionally about the transformation from one life to another? The question is there for you to explore further.
This wasn’t something I had considered, more by chance that I want the tear to be through the face. Understandably this could represent something of a suggested narrative. For me, it was more frustration of not being able to control it as much as id wanted through the use of photoshop. Had the tear not separated the eyes and just been a top and bottom composition, then this I don’t believe would have had the impact I was looking for. The eyes have to say something in a portrait I believe the route to the sole as some people would say.
I had placed this on the student forum to see how my peers would receive it? Although only a couple commented on it, there wasn’t anything that was negative, some even praised the elements of the image, I wasn’t expecting that.


Areas within the feedback open up for discussion where I agree with some elements. As to the propaganda and advertising part. I have to say yes to this. People have tried to portray this in the recent adverts of going from one person to another or a percentage need not apply to this organisation giving the viewer a different perspective of what they think is being recruited.
Where do I go now?
- Address areas of rework
- address the learning outcomes
- Attempt the mini-series
- prepare for assessment submission for November
